On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 08:34 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On dim., 2012-05-27 at 00:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ... > > With all due respect, So far I have not seen any bug report causing the > > gcc-4.7 as default compiler being serious enough to make it reverted. > > Name the problematic bugs then, please. And, where is the big problem, > > please explain? > > You mean something like > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.7;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org > ?
Looks like the list of bugs for gcc-4.7 is quickly diminishing. Most remaining have patches or are pending upload. Looks like most problems was missing inclusion of <unistd.h> or some symbols no longer visible. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338283918.8802.266.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
