Hi,
> On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, >> we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release >> architectures for the Wheezy release. >> >> Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of >> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, >> as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us >> determine sparc's status for the release. > > with my DSA hat on: > > We no longer have an UltraSparc II porterbox, and we are considering > decommissioning our single remaining UltraSparc II buildd machine. > > Maybe it would be a good idea to officially drop US II support from > wheezy since we won't have hardware to test issues on. Might make sense, but on the other hand the USII machines were usually those where issues did *not* show up. Especially USIII liked to be a problem child as the specs were never released by sun. It got better with USIV again... So some state like 'not officially supported, but should just work' is probably the best for USII. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
