Adam D. Barratt dijo [Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:06:41PM +0100]: > > (3) most of the packages that need fixing are leaf packages, or packages > > for which the Ruby bindings can be easily disabled > > That's one way of getting rid of the bugs, yes. :-) > (...)
Given you say this with a smiley - I think it is *good* to get rid of the bugs this way. One of my personal gripes with the Ruby culture is that it's quite based on the "throw many new ideas at the problem, then discard all the worse ones" mindset. We currently have a good amount of cruft piling up. And this is a good opportunity to clean up things that should just go - Packages which have low popcon scores, no reverse dependencies, and start getting build errors (that usually means, are no longer compatible with Ruby's main version, 1.9.1). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
