Tollef,
        Thanks for the response. What about the libsystemd-daemon-dev package?
Is that required (on Linux)?

On 17/06/12 09:02, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Nicholas Bamber 
> 
>>>     However, whilst I don't know anything about systemd, this still looks
>>> like a little broken. I am puzzled that the dependency is on systemd and
>>> not libsystemd-daemon-dev. After all the libsystemd-daemon-dev package
>>> contains the "/usr/include/systemd/sd-daemon.h" file which is included
>>> by some dovecot source files.
> 
> It might be for the systemd.pc file, which is shipped in systemd itself.
> 
> The reason for this is I don't see a point in having a systemd-dev
> package that only contains this file, when installing systemd doesn't
> actually hurt or change your system any more than any other random
> non-daemon package.
> 
> I think it's fairly obvious this build-dependency only makes sense on
> Linux, yes.
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fdd9288.4070...@periapt.co.uk

Reply via email to