Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:31:50 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#679020: nmu: ovito_0.9.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679020,
regarding nmu: ovito_0.9.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
679020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
libtachyon-dev didn't depend on libtachyon-0.99 (see #675714). This bug affected
ovito, it failed to build. Now the bug is fixed and hopefully ovito should
build
in all architectures.
nmu ovito_0.9.5-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fixed libtachyon, see #675714."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (850, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Mònica Ramírez Arceda <[email protected]> (25/06/2012):
> libtachyon-dev didn't depend on libtachyon-0.99 (see #675714). This bug
> affected
> ovito, it failed to build. Now the bug is fixed and hopefully ovito should
> build
> in all architectures.
>
> nmu ovito_0.9.5-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fixed libtachyon, see #675714."
Hello,
since it failed to build, that's not about rebuilding it (binNMU) but
about trying to build it again, since the previous attempt failed.
That's called a give back, which is done like that:
gb ovito . ALL
and that's usually requested on [email protected]
Anyway, I've just done that, thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
