Hi! On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 21:15:17 +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The RC bug #678269 is filed against sup-mail because it fails >> running with Ruby 1.8. [0] >> > 1.8 or 1.9?
The current sup-mail fails to run with 1.9.1. >> [0] http://bugs.debian.org/678269 >> >> A while back ago I adopted sup-mail and have recently fixed >> so it runs with Ruby 1.9.1, which is now default in Debian. >> >> In the process of fixing sup-mail for Ruby 1.9.1 I have also >> adopted librmail-ruby1.8 and moved to the new Ruby policy >> and gem2deb packaging. >> >> sup-mail is not uploaded yet though since it depends on >> ruby-rubymail which is in NEW. >> > If you need NEW to fix RC bugs, it's usually a sign that you're doing it > wrong. Can't sup-mail be made to work with the current librmail-ruby? Probably so. There are many changes and I have transitioned almost all sup-mail's dependencies to the new ruby policy (so they run under Ruby 1.9.1). It happens that ruby-rubymail was not uploaded until a few days ago because of people's lack of time (IANADD). It might be possible to make it all run under Ruby 1.8, I don't know. But I would rather not go down that road when I now have gone through all the trouble (quite much actually) to fix everything so it runs under Ruby 1.9.1. Refrasing my original (still unanswered) question: Will whatever was uploaded to NEW before the freeze be processed or was that already frozen before the freeze? -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cabyrxsqp_++gzuxod0mzdozkkv1csrubs+rm09hwomzua9z...@mail.gmail.com
