On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 06:54:47PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Thankfully the upstream diff doesn't look too huge and I trust any > regression could be easily tracked down.
I'm basically upstream for this, so I believe this is true, yes. > I've hinted it this way to let > it stay in unstable a bit more than usual: > age-days 20 snappy/1.0.5-2 > unblock snappy/1.0.5-2 Thanks :-) > Feel free to fix the hurd FTBFS after it has migrated (please keep it > small so that it doesn't get in our way if your package needs another > update for wheezy). FWIW, this is the Hurd fix that I submitted upstream recently: http://code.google.com/p/snappy/source/detail?r=65 > (FWIW, s/biuld/build/ in debian/rules.) Oops. Thanks, I'll look into it on next upload. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
