Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:43:38 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#681910: RM: zoph/0.8.0.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681910,
regarding RM: zoph/0.8.0.1-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
681910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681910
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Zope requires substantial changes (in a new upstream) to be fit for
release with Wheezy. There is interest in doing this, but I am
suggesting
to the release team that it will not happen in time within the criteria
for freeze exceptions, and therefore to remove it from testing. A
package
in wheezy-backports seems the most sensible way to proceed IMO.
If an exception is to be granted at a later stage then a removal now is
not a death sentence.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 18:09:32 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
>
> Zope requires substantial changes (in a new upstream) to be fit for
> release with Wheezy. There is interest in doing this, but I am
> suggesting
> to the release team that it will not happen in time within the criteria
> for freeze exceptions, and therefore to remove it from testing. A
> package
> in wheezy-backports seems the most sensible way to proceed IMO.
>
removal hint added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
