On 2012-07-11 21:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Before proceeding with uploading these changes I have two questions: > > * can we expect a freeze exception for fglrx-legacy-driver > - a new source package, but based on fglrx-driver)? > > * can we expect a freeze exception for fglrx-driver > - for a new upstream release > - a single binary package rename > (compared to what is currently in sid and has an automatic freeze > exception, but is RC buggy) -- only in case a new upstream release > actually arrives in time and fixes the RC bug?
* anbe is waiting for a reply on https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00671.html before proceeding with fglrx <jcristau> anbe: i don't think we'll want to add a new package <jcristau> one fglrx is enough <jcristau> (arguably one fglrx is one too many) <anbe> jcristau, when trying to get at least one working fglrx into wheezy (and provide fglrx-legacy-driver in wheezy-backports), can we get a package rename (libxvbaw1 -> libfglrx-amdxvba1) done for wheezy? (libxvbaw1 is not in squeeze, only bpo, and would conflict with -legacy) this would simplify things to do for wheezy+1 <jcristau> anbe: i assume it has no reverse deps <jcristau> anbe: in which case i don't care <anbe> ok <anbe> jcristau, may I post your answers here in a reply to my original mail? <jcristau> sure Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
