Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:46:57 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#680647: unblock: binutils-mingw-w64/2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680647,
regarding unblock: binutils-mingw-w64/2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
680647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package binutils-mingw-w64: it drops a erroneous
Conflicts relationship with mingw32-binutils, which is required to
allow mingw32-ocaml upgrades from squeeze using apt-get (see #662746
for details).
The diff is as follows:
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e6866ff..056d74d 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+binutils-mingw-w64 (2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * binutils-mingw-w64 doesn't conflict with mingw32-binutils so remove
+ the relationship (helps with #662746).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt <[email protected]> Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:54:01 +0200
+
binutils-mingw-w64 (1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stephen Kitt ]
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 9ec7885..39dcbab 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ Package: binutils-mingw-w64
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, binutils-mingw-w64-i686, binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64
Built-Using: binutils (= ${binutils:Version})
-Conflicts: mingw32-binutils
Description: Cross-binutils for Win32 and Win64 using MinGW-w64
MinGW-w64 provides a development and runtime environment for 32- and
64-bit (x86 and x64) Windows applications using the Windows API and
@@ -25,7 +24,6 @@ Package: binutils-mingw-w64-i686
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, binutils (>= ${local:Version})
Built-Using: binutils (= ${binutils:Version})
-Conflicts: mingw32-binutils
Breaks: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1)
Replaces: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1)
Description: Cross-binutils for Win32 (x86) using MinGW-w64
@@ -39,7 +37,6 @@ Package: binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, binutils (>= ${local:Version})
Built-Using: binutils (= ${binutils:Version})
-Conflicts: mingw32-binutils
Breaks: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1)
Replaces: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1)
Description: Cross-binutils for Win64 (x64) using MinGW-w64
unblock binutils-mingw-w64/2
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 18:32:15 +0200, Stephen Kitt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please unblock package binutils-mingw-w64: it drops a erroneous
> Conflicts relationship with mingw32-binutils, which is required to
> allow mingw32-ocaml upgrades from squeeze using apt-get (see #662746
> for details).
I'm closing this since KiBi unblocked the package (thanks!) and it has
successfully transitioned to testing.
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
