Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:15:41 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#681196: unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #681196,
regarding unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
681196: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681196
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tryton-proteus. The -3 upload fixes the #680817 FTBFS,
revealed by a Lucas-powered rebuild.
unblock tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3
debdiff attached
tryton-proteus_2.2.2-3.debdiff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:11:14 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package tryton-proteus. The -3 upload fixes the #680817 FTBFS,
> revealed by a Lucas-powered rebuild.
>
Does #680817 affect the version in testing? The BTS doesn't think so,
and looking at the changes in proteus/pyson.py and setup.py I guess not.
Now on to the changes themselves:
--- tryton-proteus-2.2.1/debian/compat 2011-12-26 12:35:55.000000000 +0000
+++ tryton-proteus-2.2.2/debian/compat 2012-07-11 09:31:06.000000000 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8
+9
This is not ok during freeze.
--- tryton-proteus-2.2.1/debian/rules 2011-12-26 12:35:55.000000000 +0000
+++ tryton-proteus-2.2.2/debian/rules 2012-07-11 09:31:06.000000000 +0000
@@ -7,3 +7,6 @@
dh_auto_clean
rm -rf *.egg-info
+
+override_dh_builddeb:
+ dh_builddeb -- -Zxz -z9
neither is this, really.
So with no RC or important bug fix that I know of in this version, I'm
afraid I'm going to have to say no, sorry.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
