Hi Jonas On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 06:10:15PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Julien, and others, > > On 12-07-28 at 01:33pm, Julien Cristau wrote: > > For a request like this, if it takes more than 5 minutes to process > > it's a waste of our time. Having a clear changelog helps avoid that, > > as does not arguing or getting on your high horse when asked > > clarification questions. And by helping that, it helps get your > > request approved, which I guess is what you want? > > Yes, that is what I want. > > My apologies for not following rules and getting on my high horse. > > > How to proceeed from here? Should I now... > > * Wait for you to ask clarification questions or make a verdict? > * Make a new package fixing the bad things pointed out by Cyril - > i.e. a) mention in changelog relevant bugs that was filed after > last package release, and b) more descriptive changelog regarding > how changes was made, and c) random noise reverted? > * Something else?
(I'm only spaeking as person involved in the bugreports mentioned) Only to clarify a), it is right the bug against libweb-id-perl was cloned afterwards from the librdf-crypt-perl bugreport. I think for the release-team it would have been enough to reference to that original bugreport on librdf-crypt-perl to have the background information needed, or to [1]. [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680805#17 I cloned the bug afterwards, to have the issue tracked. As *both* packages needs to be fixed in wheezy to have the FTBFS resolved for librdf-crypt-perl in wheezy (both #682277 and #680805) Regards, Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
