Hi, On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:03:38 +0200 Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote:
> Adding the w3af maintainer to recipients. Thanks. Today, I've put pysvn and svn-workbench to unstable. I'll stay it for 1 or 2 weeks. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > choices for w3af) > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > 1. Not touch w3af > > - easiest way > > - needs simple patch to work with python2.6, at least > > (Debian doesn't have python2.5 anymore, and its source says it > > supports 2.6, not 2.7) > > - outdated version (2 years ago), maybe not useful for users > > 2. Just remove w3af from testing > > - easy > > - no reverse dependency > > - users cannot use w3af since Wheezy I prefer 1, and we can upgrade it via pinning or backports. > > 3. update w3af With my investigation, it needs more python module which isn't in Debian. It's late, so forget this choice. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
