user [email protected] usertag 637488 + wheezy-can-defer tag 637488 + wheezy-ignore thanks
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 16:45 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:37:23AM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: > > t1lib has no upstream, but a number of security vulnerabilities and reverse > > dependencies. > > > > We need to know if #637488 can be ignored for wheezy or if we should go for > > removal and file bugs against the reverse dependencies. There already are bugs against (at least some of) the reverse dependencies. I see Pino just set those as blockers against the RM bug; thanks! > We fixed up the known security issues in DSAs and while the code base is > admittedly old and crusty, I don't see this issue as pressing that the removal > cannot wait until Jessie. Looking at the tracker and the upload history - ack; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
