On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:34:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 20:26:36 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > Yes, it's a judgement call, I'd agree. My thinking is that (a) it's > > already building on all architectures (low risk) and (b) has somewhat > > better support for GCC 4.7 and (c) it's Boost :-) > > > Could providing updated boost packages in wheezy-backports be a possible > alternative?
Sure: it is a possible alternative. To be honest, however: it's not something that I will do. Regards, -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
