Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2012 02:31:01 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#684141: unblock: boinc/7.0.27+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #684141,
regarding unblock: boinc/7.0.27+dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
684141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package boinc
It is currently not in testing, once removed because of a dependency of a
virtual binary package on the unfortunate fglrx drivers.
No serious bugs. It is much superior to what debian/stable ships, especially
for the support of GPU computing.
unblock boinc/7.0.27+dfsg-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-rt-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Steffen Möller <[email protected]> (08/08/2012):
> On 08/08/2012 01:30 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > before the freeze, why didn't it migrate on its own? Out-of-date
> > binaries?
>
> Yes, PowerPC.
Ah, missing builds.
(
I thought about possibly other old binary removal needed on the
ftpmaster front, but the only one I saw was this:
boinc-amd-opencl | 7.0.27+dfsg-3+b1 | amd64, i386
------------------- Reason -------------------
[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by boinc)
)
> > Given the special circumstances around the removal of your package
> > from testing, I think we could consider letting it back in.
>
> This would be nice. Thank you.
This is the first time I'm doing this. Please note some other release
team members might have a different opinion on this subject, so this
isn't definite for wheezy:
Unblocked.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
