On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 10:38 +0800, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > I'm writing to you as I would like your approval to upload dspam package to > testing-proposed-update in order to fix bug #644392. As you can see, the > version in unstable contains to many change for an unblock request and an > upload via testing-proposed-updates is necessary.
Looking at the changes in unstable, it might be worth including the fix for #669993 too? > The patch comes from upstream and consist of fixing a commented command line > to > call exim in dspam configuration. If users uncomment the current command > line, > data loss can result from it, as explain the message [0]. > > [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644392#73 Is there a plan to get that fixed in unstable? > Except for the upload via testing-proposed-update, I think the upload respect > the criterias: minor changes to fix an RC bug. You'll find attached the > debdiff. > As soon as I get your approval I'll ask a DD to upload the package (I don't > have my gpg key where I am right now) and will come back to you once all > architectures have build the package to ask you to approve the upload. By the > way, is this step done via BTS or via mail to the ML? A bug would be preferable, as it makes it much easier to track. You can do that once the package has been uploaded though - britney won't attempt to migrate a tpu package until all architectures are available. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344795711.2978.72.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
