Your message dated Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:24:43 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#683740: unblock: statsmodels/0.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683740,
regarding unblock: statsmodels/0.4.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
683740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package statsmodels
Sorry -- I have missed 30th of July deadline... 0.4.2-1 was uploaded on June
30th, but due to a FTBFS on kfreebsd's (only) it did not propagate
(#678708). The issue was resolved by fixing joblib, statsmodels build-depends
upon and I have just filed unblock request for it (#683738).
Otherwise -- package is in a great shape, does unittesting at build time and
they pass all around.
unblock statsmodels/0.4.2-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100,
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Yaroslav Halchenko <[email protected]> (03/08/2012):
> Please unblock package statsmodels
>
> Sorry -- I have missed 30th of July deadline... 0.4.2-1 was uploaded
> on June 30th, but due to a FTBFS on kfreebsd's (only) it did not
> propagate (#678708). The issue was resolved by fixing joblib,
> statsmodels build-depends upon and I have just filed unblock request
> for it (#683738).
>
> Otherwise -- package is in a great shape, does unittesting at build
> time and they pass all around.
>
> unblock statsmodels/0.4.2-1
138 files changed, 11523 insertions(+), 7206 deletions(-)
The diff against testing is *huge* but I'll pretend portability
improvements are worth letting things like code clean up go in at this
very late point.
(Yay for 5000 lines being moved around, btw.)
Also, I'll mention being consistent with the #683738 unblock helped me
getting convinced this isn't the worse way.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
