On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 20:48 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > rhnsd was uploaded before the freeze, did not have any RC bugs and > looking at http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rhnsd.html and similar sites > I can't see a reason why it was not unblocked automatically to migrate > to testing as the other packages which were uploaded around that time.
It _was_ unblocked automatically. The excuses from the evening britney run on July 20th (fairly arbitrarily chosen from the period in which automatic unblocks were in force) show: <li><a id="rhnsd" name="rhnsd">rhnsd</a> (- to 4.9.15-1) <ul> <li>Maintainer: Miroslav Suchý <li>23 days old (needed 10 days) <li>Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by freeze-exception <li>Valid candidate > As this is the only missing piece to add spacewalk client support to > wheezy, it would be great if you could unblock it. (Leaving aside arguments as to whether we should be introducing new packages now, ) an unblock wouldn't help. There may not have been any bugs filed against the package but it /is/ buggy, which is why it failed to migrate during the month that it had an automatic exception: $ edos-debcheck -explain -checkonly rhnsd < unstable/Packages_kfreebsd-amd64 rhnsd (= 4.9.15-1): FAILED rhnsd (= 4.9.15-1) depends on one of: - rhn-client-tools (= 1.8.9-1) rhn-client-tools (= 1.8.9-1) depends on missing: - python-ethtool python-ethtool | 0.7-1.1 | testing | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc python-ethtool | 0.7-1.1 | unstable | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
