Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:35:02 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#685939: unblock: bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #685939,
regarding unblock: bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
685939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685939
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package bouncycastle
It appears on my radar because it was pending in unstable without testing
migration for at least 6 months and 4 packages in wheezy FTBFS because of this
package failing to migrate to unstable :
#684841, #684829, #684815 and #684826
I've uploaded a package with fixed Build-Depends and requested removal of -gcj
packages in kfreebsd-* archs.
Changelog :
bouncycastle (1.46+dfsg-7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Team upload.
* Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.3: no changes needed.
* As per Java Policy, remove "Depends: default-jre | java2-runtime"
and "Suggests: java-virtual-machine" from library packages:
only programs need explicit depends on runtime.
* Force a Build-Depends on default-jdk (>= 1:1.6) to indicate that this
package needs some classes (like java.security.spec.ECFieldF2m) which
are not available in GCJ classpath (Closes: #678904).
* Remove Build-Depends on quilt and debian/README.source file
since we already use quilt (3.0) source format.
unblock bouncycastle/1.46+dfsg-7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Damien - Debian Developper
http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 26/08/12 22:38, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Please unblock package bouncycastle
It appears on my radar because it was pending in unstable without
testing migration for at least 6 months and 4 packages in wheezy
FTBFS because of this package failing to migrate to unstable :
#684841, #684829, #684815 and #684826
There was already an unblock request for this one. Please see #684963.
(and please check before filing new bugs). The other submitter asks
permission for an upload in t-p-u though. Given the diff between
Wheezy's and Sid's bouncycastle, it is pretty clear that 1.46+dfsg-7
won't make it to Wheezy… unless you have very strong arguments.
I'm closing this bugreport. Please feel free to follow-up on #684963.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---
