On 13.09.2012 08:26, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 07:53 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> while poco seems to be removed from testing due to some longer
standing
> RC bugs there are packages (build-)depending from it remaining in
> testing (example: sitplus, see #680798).
There seems to be some confusion here. sitplus is _not_ in testing.
It
hasn't been in testing since June.
[...]
Without a lot of persuading, britney won't allow there to be
packages in
testing which depend on packages which aren't also in testing.
Build
dependencies aren't enforced, but a review of the Sources files for
testing didn't show any packages Build-Depending on poco; would you
be
able to specify those?
[...]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/sitplus.git;a=blob;f=debian/control
It lists libpoco-dev as Build-Depends and #680798 is exactly about
the
lack of the required Build-Depends.
Indeed. As above however, sitplus isn't in testing, so doesn't really
satisfy the
criterion of "packages (build-)depending from it remaining in testing"
:-)
(fwiw the version graph on #680798 indicates that it only affects
unstable.)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
