On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:42:11 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]> wrote: > The upload is intended to be discussed beforehand, at which point we > could have advised you on the correct version number scheme. All of > these issues are covered in the Developers Reference - > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable > > - and past mails to d-d-a; maybe it's time for another one. :-(
It's shameful (because I've translated it to Japanese X-D > In any case, proposed-updates is not backports, so the current upload > is definitely incorrect. The patch itself looks okay though. I'll get > the current package rejected so that a corrected upload can be made. > Once you receive confirmation from dak that it's been rejected, please > feel free to re-upload using version number 2.2.1-1.1+squeeze1 and > without mentioning backports in the changelog. :-) Okay, I'll do it as your advice. > It would be appreciated if you could follow the procedures described > above for any future uploads. I should remember that. Yes, promise. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
