Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:06:19 +0100
with message-id <1348434379.21568.51.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688495,
regarding unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688495
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package osm2pgsql.
Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the changelog,
and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug #687965.
I'm attaching the git diff with the version currently in testing.
unblock osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
Thanks,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 13a19fd..def62db 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update Recommends of postgresql-8.4-postgis to -9.1
+ * Backport support for 64-bit IDs (Closes: #687965)
+
+ -- David Paleino <da...@debian.org> Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:14:15 +0200
+
osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New SVN snapshot
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index e616531..21e9d9f 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Depends:
, ${misc:Depends}
Recommends:
postgis
- , postgresql-8.4-postgis
+ , postgresql-9.1-postgis
Suggests:
josm
, gosmore
diff --git a/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e135d06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From: David Paleino <da...@debian.org>
+Subject: backport support for 64-bit IDs
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Origin: vendor
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687965
+
+---
+ osmtypes.h | 3 +--
+ output-gazetteer.c | 4 ++--
+ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/osmtypes.h
++++ osm2pgsql/osmtypes.h
+@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
+ #include <inttypes.h>
+ #include <time.h>
+
+-// uncomment the following to build a version that supports 64bit IDs.
+-// #define OSMID64
++#define OSMID64
+
+ #ifdef OSMID64
+ typedef int64_t osmid_t;
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/output-gazetteer.c
++++ osm2pgsql/output-gazetteer.c
+@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
+ "CREATE TABLE place (" \
+ " place_id BIGINT," \
+ " osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL," \
+- " osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL," \
++ " osm_id " POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE " NOT NULL," \
+ " class TEXT NOT NULL," \
+ " type TEXT NOT NULL," \
+ " name keyvalue[]," \
+@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
+ #define V2_CREATE_PLACE_TABLE \
+ "CREATE TABLE place (" \
+ " osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL," \
+- " osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL," \
++ " osm_id " POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE " NOT NULL," \
+ " class TEXT NOT NULL," \
+ " type TEXT NOT NULL," \
+ " name HSTORE," \
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index dde124e..be78265 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
00-fix_build.patch
01-disable_gazetteer.patch
+02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 22:15 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:07:58 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > > Should I upload a new version with a notice about the database migration?
> >
> > If there's not a sane way to avoid users having to fix things up, yes
> > please.
>
> There you go, -4 uploaded to sid, diff attached.
Thanks; unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
