On Thu, September 27, 2012 22:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) >> > during the point release >> > b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) >> > c) get a newer (well, higher versioned) ia32-libs package in to >> unstable >> > - on both amd64 _and_ ia64 - before Saturday morning. >> > >> > Longer term, stable updates probably want a different version >> scheme... >> >> Right... this worked in the past but fails now there's been some action >> on >> ia32-libs in sid. I can upload a new version (20120102+squeeze1 I >> propose), do you need to reject the current upload first? > > It's already in proposed-updates, so out of our hands to do anything > about it; we can't reject it and a new upload to p-u would need a higher > version than what's currently there. :-(
Let me know when I can do something. FWIW, there has already been a proposal to epoch the sid version of ia32-libs for different reasons (#688915), so perhaps the route to accept this version in squeeze and wheezy may be viable. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
