On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 08:38 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > I'm not sure wheter there is active _upstream_ security support for > lightning but I guess thats not different from some other packages. > > One of the reasons to build iceowl-extension from icedove instead of > iceowl was to get all the fixes that go into that source tree for free > including security ones (which might not be the case for standalone > iceowl) and to have in sync versions of those two. So the situation is > certainly better than in squeeze. I'm also happy to backport security > issues for iceowl-extension (knowledge permitting).
Thanks for the explanation. I'm happy enough with that as long as Moritz is. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
