On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:30 PM, LaMont Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the >> release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct >> to t-p-u. > > Works for me. I'll toss 9.8.4 into sid. As for getting it into wheezy, > it'll make the support life easier for the inevitable security fixes that > will follow. There are probably other reasons.
I can do a manual code review for debian-release team if they are interested. I concur with LaMont that we need latest 9.8.x branch to keep the sanity of the maintainer. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALjhHG8gX7yfSYmK=8x+27hynhyvi-jmgz_on1ks_h9vox0...@mail.gmail.com
