Your message dated Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:29:13 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#694316: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694316,
regarding unblock: klibc/2.0.1-3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
694316: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694316
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package klibc
The upload fixes RC bug #692951.
unblock klibc/2.0.1-3.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru klibc-2.0.1/debian/changelog klibc-2.0.1/debian/changelog
--- klibc-2.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-10-08 21:58:29.000000000 +0200
+++ klibc-2.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-11-12 17:51:57.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+klibc (2.0.1-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload with consent of maintainer.
+ * Add migration script for /usr/share/doc/libklibc-dev (Closes: #692951)
+
+ -- Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:30:14 +0000
+
klibc (2.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Bill Pringlemeir ]
diff -Nru klibc-2.0.1/debian/libklibc-dev.postinst klibc-2.0.1/debian/libklibc-dev.postinst
--- klibc-2.0.1/debian/libklibc-dev.postinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ klibc-2.0.1/debian/libklibc-dev.postinst 2012-11-12 17:51:10.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# From MirOS: contrib/hosted/tg/deb/mksh/debian/pdksh.postinst,v 1.2 2012/06/27 07:16:31 tg Exp $
+
+set -e
+
+# This maintainer script can be called the following ways:
+#
+# * new-postinst "configure" [$most_recently_configured_version]
+# The package is unpacked; all dependencies are unpacked and, when there
+# are no circular dependencies, configured.
+#
+# * old-postinst "abort-upgrade" $new_version
+# * conflictors-postinst "abort-remove" "in-favour" $package
+# $new_version
+# * postinst "abort-remove"
+# * deconfigureds-postinst "abort-deconfigure" "in-favour"
+# $failed_install_package $fip_version ["removing"
+# $conflicting_package $cp_version]
+# The package is unpacked; all dependencies are at least Half-Installed,
+# previously been configured, and not removed. In some error situations,
+# dependencies may not be even fully unpacked.
+#
+# * postinst "triggered" "${triggers[*]}"
+# For trigger-only calls, i.e. if "configure" is not called.
+
+docdir=/usr/share/doc/libklibc-dev
+move_docdir() {
+ test -d /usr/share/doc/. || return 0
+ test -d $docdir && rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty $docdir
+ if test -e $docdir; then
+ echo >&2 "The old $docdir was locally modified."
+ echo >&2 "Saved as $docdir.dpkg-old"
+ (mv $docdir $docdir.dpkg-old || :)
+ fi
+ if test -e $docdir; then
+ echo >&2 "FAILED! Remove $docdir manually,"
+ echo >&2 "then retry (dpkg -a --configure)."
+ exit 1
+ fi
+ ln -sf libklibc $docdir
+}
+
+case $1 in
+configure)
+ # convert old docdir into a symlink, dpkg won't do that for us
+ test -h $docdir || move_docdir
+ ;;
+
+abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
+ ;;
+
+triggered)
+ ;;
+
+*)
+ echo >&2 "postinst called with unknown subcommand '$1'"
+ exit 1
+ ;;
+esac
+
+# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
+# generated by other debhelper scripts.
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 16:15 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <[email protected]> (25/11/2012):
> > Already unblocked, but needs a d-i ack due to the udeb (which was
> > already being discussed earlier, but you couldn't have known that).
>
> No objection for d-i, thanks.
unblock-udeb added as well then; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
