Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:10:40 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #690458,
regarding RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
690458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: rm
blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug
#638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but
it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove
from testing only.
Ben.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:47:15 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:31:26 +0000, Alan Woodland wrote:
>
> > On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi Alan,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
> > >
> > >> There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
> > >> the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package
> > >> should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the
> > >> future in my view.
> > >>
> > > Any progress here?
> > I have prepared an upload, which drops the no longer functional -dkms
> > package and removes the recommends, but I'm still debating the merits
> > of adding a conflicts with the older versions of the -dkms package.
> >
> It would be nice to have that in ASAP; I don't think a conflict would be
> needed, but don't mind much either way…
>
Thanks for the 0.8.4-3 upload. Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
