Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:54:54 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#695161: unblock: extundelete/0.2.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695161,
regarding unblock: extundelete/0.2.0-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
695161: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695161
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package extundelete
This release fixes an important bug which pretty much makes the package
useless (#670815).
(I just realized that such bug should actually have a higher severity.
Is it useful to increase the severity of a closed bug from a release
point of view?)
Attached you will find the debdiff against the package in testing.
unblock extundelete/0.2.0-2.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 16:34 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Please unblock package extundelete
>
> This release fixes an important bug which pretty much makes the package
> useless (#670815).
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
