On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 11:40 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:27:37 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > > >> Is this invasive? > >> > > Is this a real question? It changes things about the generated code > > that can't be reviewed... > > Hmm. Sorry, I did not understand about mean "invasive". > In current freeze stage , is that you do not support adoption of fix > for hardening?
Unless an argument can be made for a package particularly needing hardening support adding (e.g. it's on the security team's list) then such changes are generally too invasive to be made at this stage via unstable. The fact that we're discussing a tpu upload makes that even more the case, as the package won't get the customary days of testing in unstable before migrating. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
