Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:28:38 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#689973: unblock: mimedefang/2.73-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #689973,
regarding unblock: mimedefang/2.71-3 (TPU pre-approval)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
689973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689973
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mimedefang

Version 2.73-2 fixes release critical Bug #688196 (piuparts).

It also adds two default options to
/usr/share/mimedefang/mimedefang.conf which is the prototype for
/etc/defaults/mimedefang for new installations. The same default
configuraton is in /etc/init.d/mimedefang, so the normal behavior is
not changed.

unblock mimedefang/2.73-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers precise-updates
  APT policy: (900, 'precise-updates'), (900, 'precise-security'), (900,
'precise')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-31-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Instant-Messaging: Jabber: [email protected]
  (Siehe http://www.zdv.uni-mainz.de/4010.php)

<<attachment: martin.vcf>>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:07 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 18:13 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > Am 20.12.2012 16:49, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 16:17:06 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > > 
> > >> I removed the NEWS.Debian change and built a new package. The new
> > >> debdiff is attached.
> > >>
> > >> What do you think? Is this ok now?
> > >>
> > > Yes, thanks.
> > 
> > Ok. Should I upload the package somewhere?
> 
> ftp-master would be conventional. (i.e. the same as any other package.)

Approved; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to