On 24/12/12 at 19:26 +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 24/12/12 18:32, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > >> And I also wonder if this may have happened with any other packages; > >> could RC bugs for Wheezy have gone missing for similar reasons? > > > > No, because they still show up in > > http://bugs.debian.org/bugscan/britney/testing-nr and > > http://bugs.debian.org/bugscan/other/testing.html for example. > > I see, thanks. The ones that seem to be missing from UDD bugs.cgi are: > > Because of renamed source package: > libjavascriptcoregtk-3.0-0 688640 > libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 651636 > libwebkitgtk-3.0-0 642750,694971,673469
Nice catch. Fixed in c506733b2f51674eabcde6c6b29f3b3b54cb36c5 (that code is there to ignore all bugs filed against pseudo-packages, I've modified it to check if the source package is in testing OR the binary package is in testing) > Missing for unknown reasons: > gvfs 624507 > lcdf-typetools 694352 > libfbclient2 692948 > libimager-qrcode-perl 692979 Err... > Fixed in sid, not wheezy, but missing from UDD bugs.cgi "Release View": > kdepim-runtime 696054 > libmpich2-dev 653616 > mpich2 666066 those are now fixed in wheezy > minidjvu 654491 > mtpfs 696552 > php5-ps 694748 > python-cups 667995 > spatialite-bin 661018 those are apparently suffering from the same problem as the 4 bugs above. I suspect that the problem is that one of the db used by Debbugs is changed in the middle of the bug import by the synchronization scripts. I've added a dirty workaround (cancel the import if those files change). Let's see if it improves the situation. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
