Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:36:50 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#696984: unblock: gsl/1.15+dfsg.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #696984,
regarding unblock: gsl/1.15+dfsg.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
696984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696984
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock gsl/1.15+dfsg.2-2.
It seems gsl/1.15+dfsg.2-2 was uploaded by Dirk Eddelbuettel to fix bug
#696014 (non-free GFDL docs). As there is no unblock request yet, I'm filing
one now.
I manually created the diff without -N. It just shows 'Only in
gsl_1.15+dfsg-1: doc' instead of the 5 MB of removed docs, which is probably
easier to review.
The change in -2 fixes an FTBFS in -1 by adding the build-arch and build-indep
targets.
unblock gsl/1.15+dfsg.2-2
Cheers,
Ivo
diff -ur gsl_1.15+dfsg-1/debian/changelog gsl_1.15+dfsg.2-2/debian/changelog
--- gsl_1.15+dfsg-1/debian/changelog 2012-12-30 01:21:47.000000000 +0100
+++ gsl_1.15+dfsg.2-2/debian/changelog 2012-12-30 01:21:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,23 @@
+gsl (1.15+dfsg.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/rules: Correct switch to build-index and build-arch and ensure
+ that their target build-stamp depends on configure-stamp. (Closes: #696014)
+
+ -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:39:57 -0600
+
+gsl (1.15+dfsg.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * "Second DFSG attempt" at GSL 1.15, now with GFDL in sources too
+ * doc/* directory removed from 'dfsg.2' tarball to ensure source tarball
+ in Debian archive also dfsg clean (Closes: #695776)
+
+ * debian/control: Set Standards-Version: to current version
+
+ -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:06:23 -0600
+
gsl (1.15+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
- * New upstream release
+ * New upstream version released today
* doc/*: As before, removed the 'non-free' documentation to create a
source package that complies with Debian's interpretation of what is free.
diff -ur gsl_1.15+dfsg-1/debian/control gsl_1.15+dfsg.2-2/debian/control
--- gsl_1.15+dfsg-1/debian/control 2012-12-30 01:21:47.000000000 +0100
+++ gsl_1.15+dfsg.2-2/debian/control 2012-12-30 01:21:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: math
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]>
-Standards-Version: 3.9.1
+Standards-Version: 3.9.4
Build-Depends: gawk | awk, debhelper (>= 5.0.0), libtool, gcc (>= 4:4.0),
binutils (>= 2.12.90.0.9), autotools-dev
Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl
diff -ur gsl_1.15+dfsg-1/debian/rules gsl_1.15+dfsg.2-2/debian/rules
--- gsl_1.15+dfsg-1/debian/rules 2012-12-30 01:21:47.000000000 +0100
+++ gsl_1.15+dfsg.2-2/debian/rules 2012-12-30 01:21:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# -*- makefile -*-
# debian/rules file for the Debian/GNU Linux gsl package
-# Copyright (C) 1999 - 2007 by Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]>
+# Copyright (C) 1999 - 2012 by Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]>
source := $(shell head -1 debian/changelog | awk '{print $$1}')
sonum := 0
@@ -129,8 +129,10 @@
touch configure-prof-stamp
-build: configure build-stamp
-build-stamp:
+build: build-arch build-indep
+build-arch: build-stamp
+build-indep: build-stamp
+build-stamp: configure-stamp
dh_testdir
$(MAKE)
touch build-stamp
Only in gsl_1.15+dfsg-1: doc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 11:48 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Please unblock gsl/1.15+dfsg.2-2.
>
> It seems gsl/1.15+dfsg.2-2 was uploaded by Dirk Eddelbuettel to fix bug
> #696014 (non-free GFDL docs). As there is no unblock request yet, I'm filing
> one now.
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
