> Hi Harald, Hi Jonathan
> > Harald Jenny wrote: > > > I have retitled the bug request to > > > > unblock: openswan/1:2.6.38-1 > > > > The version is now in unstable and awaits your (hopefully positive) > > decision. > > debdiff attached for reference. diffstat: > > 598 files changed, 11061 insertions(+), 5908 deletions(-) > > Is there some subset of these changes that can bring about the same > interoperability improvement? Any words to calm fears about the > chance of regression among these changes? Well the unblock request was made some months ago at the beginning of the freeze where a new upstream version wouldn't have been such a great issue I presume but now at this stage of the freeze I consider it not appropriate anymore to do such a migration. For the interop fixes maybe they could be backported but openswan upstream is dead and the project already got forked so we won't realy get help and testing for this task. > > I am not an expert in this area at all, but I fear that without > further information the most likely release team reply is negative. I guess so too therefore I'm currently thinking about chancelling the unblock request and instead prepare a backport for wheezy-backports ASAP - Rene what is your opinion on this matter? > > Hope that helps, > Jonathan Yes thanks I will wait for Rene's answer and then presumably close this request, thanks Kind regards Harald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
