Your message dated Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:20:41 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#689572: nmu: packages linked against libhdf5-7 <<
1.8.8-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689572,
regarding nmu: packages linked against libhdf5-7 << 1.8.8-7.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
689572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
There're several packages currently in Debian testing having a
versioned dependency on the semi-virtual libhdf5-7 package
(apparently as the result of being built prior to Source: hdf5
1.8.8-7.1 propagating to testing on 2012-02-23.)
Consequently, these packages cannot be installed along with any
of the other libraries providing libhdf5-7 (check, e. g., [1].)
I'm therefore suggesting re-building these packages against the
now-current libhdf5-7, with binNMU's as specified below.
TIA.
nmu libcgns_3.1.3.4-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu nexus_4.2.1-svn1614-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu r-cran-hdf5_1.6.10-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu tessa_0.3.1-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu udav_0.7.1.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
The hdf-eos5_5.1.14+dfsg.1-1 currently in Debian unstable fixes
the issue (as well as a few others), but unless it's unblocked
(and enters Debian testing), it has to be re-built just as well:
nmu hdf-eos5_5.1.13.dfsg.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >=
1.8.8-7.1'
[1] http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libhdf5-7
JFTR, the respective Source: hdf5 Debian changelog [2] entry is:
--cut:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog --
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them. And don't version the
libhdf5-7 symbols file, so the dependency can also be satisfied by the mpi
packages' Provides.
* Use DEB_HOST_ARCH instead of DEB_BUILD_ARCH in debian/rules.
* Don't require root for debian/rules clean.
-- Julien Cristau <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:25:35 +0000
--cut:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog --
The PTS entries for the packages affected are as follows.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hdf-eos5.html
• [2012-02-24] hdf-eos5 5.1.13.dfsg.1-3 MIGRATED to testing
(Britney)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcgns.html
• [2012-01-24] Accepted 3.1.3.4-1 in unstable (low) (Sylvestre
Ledru)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nexus.html
• [2011-07-31] Accepted 4.2.1-svn1614-1 in unstable (low) (Tobias
Stefan Richter)
(Although nexus was re-built once as 4.2.1-svn1614-1+b1, it was
on 2012-01-26, thus before hdf5_1.8.8-7.1, and still bearing a
possibly unwarranted versioned dependency on libhdf5-7.)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/r-cran-hdf5.html
• [2012-01-18] Accepted 1.6.10-1 in unstable (low) (Dirk
Eddelbuettel)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tessa.html
• [2012-02-20] Accepted 0.3.1-6 in unstable (low) (Josselin Mouette)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udav.html
• [2012-01-25] Accepted 0.7.1.2-3 in unstable (low) (Salvatore
Bonaccorso)
--
FSF associate member #7257
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 14:01:17 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
>
> There're several packages currently in Debian testing having a
> versioned dependency on the semi-virtual libhdf5-7 package
> (apparently as the result of being built prior to Source: hdf5
> 1.8.8-7.1 propagating to testing on 2012-02-23.)
>
> Consequently, these packages cannot be installed along with any
> of the other libraries providing libhdf5-7 (check, e. g., [1].)
> I'm therefore suggesting re-building these packages against the
> now-current libhdf5-7, with binNMU's as specified below.
>
> TIA.
>
> nmu libcgns_3.1.3.4-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
> nmu nexus_4.2.1-svn1614-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
> nmu r-cran-hdf5_1.6.10-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
> nmu tessa_0.3.1-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
> nmu udav_0.7.1.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1'
>
Scheduled.
> The hdf-eos5_5.1.14+dfsg.1-1 currently in Debian unstable fixes
> the issue (as well as a few others), but unless it's unblocked
> (and enters Debian testing), it has to be re-built just as well:
>
> nmu hdf-eos5_5.1.13.dfsg.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >=
> 1.8.8-7.1'
>
Meh.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
