Le 02/07/13 18:07, Michael Stapelberg a écrit : > Hi Adam, > > Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> writes: >> Therefore, I will now build it on armhf, which will take around a day. > Update: the armhf build failed because about 100 testcases fail. > > I have no clue on how to fix this and can’t spend much more time on > debugging this either. > > Given that the 3.0 version works — it passed all the clang tests and can > compile non-trivial software on armhf and amd64 — can we just upload > that? Or, as a last resort, re-introduce 3.0 in unstable, even if > switching to an epoch is ugly? > Don't bother too much about the epoch, clang source package is going to be removed anyway... (I am working on a LLVM toolchain package including llvm + clang + other stuff).
Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5113f296.2030...@debian.org
