Hi Bdale, Bdale Garbee wrote (28 Dec 2012 21:42:25 GMT) : > I don't care if this version promotes to wheezy or not.
Well noted. > I thought at one point it was a goal to get more hardening done for > wheezy packages, Sure it was, and I, for one, do hope that dh compat level >= 9 brings even more for Jessie! > and this seems like an innocuous set of changes to me. FTR, and just to clarify, I've seen at least one member of the release team express something similar to: the kind of effects hardening build flags have can't easily be reviewed in a debdiff, that's why they are generally rejected at this stage of the freeze (unless the package is part of one of the more specific hardening sub-goals set by the security team). > Had the unblock request been processed when it was first made it > probably would have been fine, but I see no reason to push on it at > this point. Understood. So, I recommend the release team closes this unblock request. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
