Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:06:50 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#690611: unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690611,
regarding unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
690611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package gtkhotkey.
In 0.2.1-4 and 0.2.1-5, I supported multiarch.
---
gtkhotkey (0.2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Update debian/control.
- Add 'Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}' to libgtkhotkey-dev.
- Add 'Multi-Arch: same' to libgtkhotkey-dev.
-- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:11:14 +0900
gtkhotkey (0.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Update debian/control.
- Add Version for cdbs.
- Add 'Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}' to libgtkhotkey1.
- Add 'Multi-Arch: same' to libgtkhotkey1.
* Update debian/rules.
Add DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS for multi-arch support.
* Update debian/libgtkhotkey1.install.
Convert to multi-arch support.
* Update debian/libgtkhotkey-dev.install.
Convert to multi-arch support.
-- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Aug 2012 06:47:06 +0900--
-----
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
unblock gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
gtkhotkey_0.2.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:00 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 00:51:44 GMT) :
> > Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Nov 2012 17:13:53 GMT) :
> >> Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
> >> stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-dependencies are currently
> >> m-a tagged, nor sound like applications one would particularly need to
> >> install for multiple architectures simultaneously.
>
> > Ping?
>
> No feedback from the requester for 4.5 months and the package does not
> look particularly buggy in testing currently, so I recommend the
> release team rejects this unblock request.
Yep, sounds fair to me; thanks for the follow-up. Maintainer, please
re-open if you wish, but with an answer to the early question.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
