Your message dated Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:52:32 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#701624: unblock: dbus-glib/0.100.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #701624,
regarding unblock: dbus-glib/0.100.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
701624: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701624
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package dbus-glib:
unblock dbus-glib/0.100.2-1
Versions 0.100 and 0.100.1 were released with outdated generated files in
the doc/ subdirectory of the tarball. As a result, the API documentation
built by the package was very incomplete (#701623). I have resolved this
upstream by releasing a new 0.100.2 tarball built in a clean directory.
The diffstat (below) is considerable, but most of it is the generated
documentation (which is in the tarball, and is also re-generated during
build) becoming more complete. The only "real source change" is 2 lines
in configure.ac to change the version number, and the debian/changelog entry.
Regards,
S
+dbus-glib (0.100.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream release
+ - respin upstream tarball to fix the HTML documentation (Closes: #701623)
+ - no source changes
+
+ -- Simon McVittie <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:58:58 +0000
ChangeLog | 124
config.guess | 49
config.sub | 74
configure | 20
configure.ac | 2
debian/changelog | 8
depcomp | 190 -
doc/reference/dbus-glib-sections.txt | 264 -
doc/reference/dbus-glib.types | 1
doc/reference/html/ch01.html | 2
doc/reference/html/ch02.html | 29
doc/reference/html/ch03.html | 6
doc/reference/html/dbus-binding-tool.html | 8
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-DBus-GLib-low-level.html | 248 +
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-DBus-GObject-related-functions.html | 308 +
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-DBusGConnection.html | 388 ++
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-DBusGError.html | 239 +
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-DBusGMessage.html | 155
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-DBusGMethod.html | 239 +
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-DBusGProxy.html | 1069 +++++
doc/reference/html/dbus-glib-Specializable-GType-System.html | 1900 +++++++
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 13:41:22 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please consider unblocking package dbus-glib:
>
> unblock dbus-glib/0.100.2-1
>
> Versions 0.100 and 0.100.1 were released with outdated generated files in
> the doc/ subdirectory of the tarball. As a result, the API documentation
> built by the package was very incomplete (#701623). I have resolved this
> upstream by releasing a new 0.100.2 tarball built in a clean directory.
>
> The diffstat (below) is considerable, but most of it is the generated
> documentation (which is in the tarball, and is also re-generated during
> build) becoming more complete. The only "real source change" is 2 lines
> in configure.ac to change the version number, and the debian/changelog entry.
>
Doesn't seem like this should have bumped shlibs...
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
