Hi, On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:35:32PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > So, I'm fine with the diff you sent in principle, but the actual > diff from testing->sid is rather larger:
argh. damn. I forgot that this diverged because hsqldb didn't migrate in time due to (afair) archive issues... > +hsqldb (1.8.0.10-13) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * explicitly build with openjdk-7 as the Java7 patch doesn't > + seem to be working with gcj (closes: #675834). Thus ... > + * ... disable -gcj > + > + -- Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:45:35 +0200 > + > +hsqldb (1.8.0.10-12) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * add patch to fix build with Java 7 > + > + -- Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:41:24 +0200 > + > > Are you also seeking unblocks for those or are we looking at tpu? I would believe that you wouldn't accept the above, so I fear we'd need tpu, yes :-( I can use the same orig for that, can't I? Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
