Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:51:04 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#702523: Bug#702486: libnet-twitter-perl: version 4.x
required for new Twitter API
has caused the Debian Bug report #703258,
regarding RM: libnet-twitter-perl/3.18003-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
703258: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing libnet-twitter-perl. The current twitter API
is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase
(bug #702486, which are likely unacceptable at this point in the
freeze.
Note that this will also require removing its reverse-dependency webgui.
Thanks,
Mike
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:59:36PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:35:41 +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:51:30PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:25:51PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > > > The upstream diffs are quite large:
> > > >
> > > > https://metacpan.org/diff/release/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-Lite-0.11002/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-Lite-0.12000
> > > >
> > > > https://metacpan.org/diff/release/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-3.18003/MMIMS/Net-Twitter-4.00003
> > > >
> > > > but the alternative is probably removing both from wheezy (and squeeze).
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts: new upstream releases; remove; something else?
> > >
> > > I'm tending towards removal, sadly. The upstream diff is indeed rather
> > > large and at this stage, rather unwieldy. I realise lots of it is
> > > refactoring, but the functional changes would normally rule this out for
> > > an
> > > unblock.
> > >
> > > There is a reverse dependency to consider, I just opened a bug to get
> > > Michael's comments.
> >
> > Michael is happy for tircd to be removed too, since it is dead upstream. So
> > the way is clear for libnet-twitter-perl and libnet-twitter-lite-perl if
> > that is the way you want to go.
>
> "want to go" is a bit strong :) but as I see it we don't have any
> sane alternative at this stage of the freeze, so feel free to remove
> the two packages from testing.
Ok, removal hint added.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
