Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:21:02 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#703926: tpu: libsocialweb/0.25.20-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #703926,
regarding tpu: libsocialweb/0.25.20-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
703926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703926
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: tpu
Hi,
I want to put libsocialweb-0.25.20-2.1 to t-p-u to fix CVE-2012-4511.
diff -Nru libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/changelog
libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/changelog
--- libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/changelog 2012-06-22 12:08:40.000000000
+0900
+++ libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/changelog 2013-03-25 08:47:37.000000000
+0900
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libsocialweb (0.25.20-2.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/patches
+ - add CVE-2012-4511.patch
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:46:56 +0900
+
libsocialweb (0.25.20-2) unstable; urgency=low
* MultiArch support
diff -Nru libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4511.patch
libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4511.patch
--- libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4511.patch 1970-01-01
09:00:00.000000000 +0900
+++ libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4511.patch 2013-03-25
08:46:37.000000000 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Description: patch for CVE-2012-4511
+
+---
+Origin: upstream
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/690675
+Last-Update: 2013-03-25
+
+--- libsocialweb-0.25.20.orig/services/flickr/flickr.c
++++ libsocialweb-0.25.20/services/flickr/flickr.c
+@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ online_notify (gboolean online, gpointer
+ SW_DEBUG (FLICKR, "Online: %s", online ? "yes" : "no");
+
+ if (online) {
+- got_tokens_cb (priv->proxy, TRUE, g_object_ref (service));
++ credentials_updated (service);
+ } else {
+ priv->authorised = FALSE;
+
diff -Nru libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/series
libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/series
--- libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/series 2011-06-04 22:45:22.000000000
+0900
+++ libsocialweb-0.25.20/debian/patches/series 2013-03-25 08:45:19.000000000
+0900
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
01_detect_NM_and_ConnMan.patch
+CVE-2012-4511.patch
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:00:13AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:38:14 +0000
> Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Please go ahead and ping this bug when it is uploaded.
>
> Thanks, uploaded.
Seems to be building happily; approved.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
