Your message dated Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:55:47 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#695637: unblock: synaptic/0.75.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #695637,
regarding unblock: synaptic/0.75.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
695637: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695637
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package synaptic.
Quick changelog:
* debian/synaptic.menu:
- use x-terminal-emulator -e synaptic-pkexec to support systems
that do not have a GUI policykit agent running (closes: #678847)
* include all origins in the origin filter not just the first one
* show all "archives" in the origins view even if they are "shadowed"
by another one
debdiff is attached.
unblock synaptic/0.75.13
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
synaptic_0.75.13.diff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 06:33 +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:33:28PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > Bob Bib wrote (11 Dec 2012 00:52:28 GMT) :
> > > * debian/synaptic.menu:
> > > - use x-terminal-emulator -e synaptic-pkexec to support systems
> > > that do not have a GUI policykit agent running (closes: #678847)
> > > * include all origins in the origin filter not just the first one
> > > * show all "archives" in the origins view even if they are "shadowed"
> > > by another one
> >
> > Please clarify how this satisfies the current freeze policy [1],
> > and if it does not, why this package should be treated differently.
[...]
> Uh, sorry for this super late reply, my real life was a bit turbulent
> recently. I would be in favour of adding a freeze exception for this
> version as the first fix is useful for desktop environments without a
> GUI policykit agent - AIUI thats most beside the big kde/gnome/xfce
> ones. And the last change is useful as it means that you will see
> packages in the security.debian.org origin even if the package is also
> available on a "normal" mirror and the sources.list entry of the
> normal mirror is before the security.d.o server. Risk should be pretty
> low for this update.
It's not really a matter of risk at this point, more severity.
I appear to be in a good mood for some reason, so unblocked. Hopefully I
won't regret that.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---