Your message dated Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:44:28 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#702787: pre-approval: unblock: python-pyrrd/0.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #702787,
regarding pre-approval: unblock: python-pyrrd/0.1.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
702787: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702787
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
I'd like to ask if the attached debdiff would be allowed in wheezy.
It fixes important bug #691230 by backporting a small patch from the
upstream repository; of course there are no other versions of the
package in sid.
The package is team-maintained, and the Uploader has been contacted,
but didn't answer.
Thanks in advance,
Elena Grandi
diff -u pyrrd-0.1.0/debian/changelog pyrrd-0.1.0/debian/changelog
--- pyrrd-0.1.0/debian/changelog
+++ pyrrd-0.1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+pyrrd (0.1.0-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Backport fix for RRD.fetch from upstream bzr revision 158
+ (git commit dcd78df45c52) (Closes: #691230)
+
+ -- Elena Grandi <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:49:11 +0100
+
pyrrd (0.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- pyrrd-0.1.0.orig/pyrrd/backend/external.py
+++ pyrrd-0.1.0/pyrrd/backend/external.py
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
data += [unicode(x) for x in obj.rra]
return (obj.filename, params + data)
- if function == 'update':
+ elif function == 'update':
validParams = ['template']
params = common.buildParameters(obj, validParams)
FIRST_VALUE = 0
@@ -277,15 +277,15 @@
data = [data for data, nil in obj.values]
return (obj.filename, params + data)
- if function == 'fetch':
+ elif function == 'fetch':
validParams = ['resolution', 'start', 'end']
params = common.buildParameters(obj, validParams)
- return (obj.filename, obj.cf, params)
+ return (obj.filename, [obj.cf] + params)
- if function == 'info':
+ elif function == 'info':
return (obj.filename, obj)
- if function == 'graph':
+ elif function == 'graph':
validParams = ['start', 'end', 'step', 'title',
'vertical_label', 'width', 'height', 'only_graph',
'upper_limit', 'lower_limit', 'rigid', 'alt_autoscale',
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:45:16PM +0100, Elena Grandi wrote:
> I'd like to ask if the attached debdiff would be allowed in wheezy.
>
> It fixes important bug #691230 by backporting a small patch from the
> upstream repository; of course there are no other versions of the
> package in sid.
As this bug is only severity:important we're now unlikely to take this fix.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
