Your message dated Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:02:51 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#705675: nmu: blender_2.66a-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #705675,
regarding nmu: blender_2.66a-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
705675: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705675
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
libsdl2 has been accepted into unstable so we want to get
libsdl-1.3 (experimental) removed.
Unfortunately blender built against libsdl-1.3 because libsdl-1.3-dev
provided libsdl-dev (which was a mistake in the first place).
I have fixed that now so please schedule a binNMU for blender so it
builds against libsdl1.2.
nmu blender_2.66a-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsdl1.2"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 13:17 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote:
> libsdl2 has been accepted into unstable so we want to get
> libsdl-1.3 (experimental) removed.
> Unfortunately blender built against libsdl-1.3 because libsdl-1.3-dev
> provided libsdl-dev (which was a mistake in the first place).
> I have fixed that now so please schedule a binNMU for blender so it
> builds against libsdl1.2.
>
> nmu blender_2.66a-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsdl1.2"
That needs a " . experimental" (or "-d experimental") to indicate that
the request doesn't apply to packages in unstable.
Scheduled, for those architectures where the previous attempt didn't
FTBFS.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
