On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 18:18 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > Am Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:00:59 +0100 > schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]>: > > The version information also indicates that the problem applies to the > > version of quagga in unstable. If that's correct, please fix it in > > unstable; if not, please add an appropriate fixed version. > > We've 0.99.22 in unstable (and 0.99.22.1 with a fix coming soon) and > 0.99.21 in testing. At this stage of the freeze, I'd rather prefer a > fixed 0.99.21 than the 0.99.22 to be released.
I wasn't suggesting that we ship 0.99.22 in wheezy, I was asking whether the package in unstable contains the fix. Looking at the code, the answer is "yes, it does", which makes your answer that it's "coming soon" slightly confusing. :-( Please go ahead with the upload. Please also fix the version information for the bug to indicate that it doesn't apply to the package in unstable. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
