Am 09.05.2013 05:39, schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > On May 8, 2013 12:05:39 PM Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >>> I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to >>> 1.53 or later -- likely to the most current Boost at the time the >>> transition is scheduled. This change does not directly impact any >>> binary packages. However, it will affect the buildability of source >>> packages. >> >> Do we know how many (and which) packages would start FTBFS if the change >> was done now? > > > Dmitrijs: did you do a full rebuild of the archive using Boost 1.53? If so, > can you post your results here?
He's away this and the next week. > If not, I'll dust off my rebuilding scripts from the last transition and have > a > go. he started that for Ubuntu, maybe this gives you a first impression: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/boost1.53.html http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ (including unrelated build failures) Fixed ceph myself, and did notice the libvigraimpex ftbfs. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
