Julien Cristau <[email protected]> writes: > That sounds bad. Don't reuse library package names for different ABIs!
I know that's bad practice in general, but the name libvibrant6 last appeared in sarge, which reached EOL five years ago, so I considered it safe to reuse by now; I recall similar policies for C++ and Fortran ABI transitions. > The NBS cleanup won't happen before njplot is rebuilt anyway, so I don't > care so much about that. OK, thanks. In that case, the only concern is a de facto conflict with ncbi-tools-x11, since libvibrant6 and libvibrant6a aren't coinstallable. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
