Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 23:20:10 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#710143: transition: libraw
has caused the Debian Bug report #710143,
regarding transition: libraw
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
710143: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710143
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 710133 710141
I'd like to request a slot for taking care of the libraw transition.
The new upstream release (in experimental) has bumped soname.
Reverse dependencies
================
* entangle
* freeimage
* luminance-hdr
* shotwell
freeimage FTBFS (#710133), but upstream already has a patch to fix it.
Also shotwell FTBFS (#710141), issue has been forwarded upstream.
Ben file:
title = "libraw";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libraw-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ "libraw9";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libraw5";
Cheers,
Luca
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 12:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:41:29 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > libraw 0.15.3-1 built everywhere, and I just uploaded fixed packages
> > for shotwell and freeimage. Could you please schedule binNMUs for the
> > other two packages?
> >
> > nmu entangle_0.5.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libraw9'
> > nmu luminance-hdr_2.3.0-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against libraw9'
> >
> On their way.
libraw5 is no longer in testing; closing.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
