Your message dated Sat, 3 Aug 2013 17:58:03 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#715218: nmu: adabrowse_4.0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #715218,
regarding nmu: adabrowse_4.0.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
715218: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715218
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu adabrowse_4.0.3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild in a current sid environment."
adequate reports
adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol
`asis__representation_clause_kindsS' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol
`asis__element_kindsN' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol
`asis__representation_clause_kindsN' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol
`asis__declaration_kindsN' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
so lets do a rebuild ... although both adabrowse and libasis2010
haven't changed for a long time, so maybe this is already a longstanding
issue.
Andreas
PS: I verified that all these symbol size mismatches reported by adequate
are fixed by rebuilding in sid.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:30:15 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > so lets do a rebuild ... although both adabrowse and libasis2010
> > haven't changed for a long time, so maybe this is already a longstanding
> > issue.
> >
> Either some lib's ABI changed and that's a bug that should be fixed. Or
> it didn't and we don't need to rebuild anything.
>
So let's not.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
